1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Discovery (217 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Discovery should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 39 kg more than 2004 Land Rover Discovery.
Because 2004 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2004 Land Rover Discovery | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | Sixty | Discovery |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 217 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2076 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 93 L |
