1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 373 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | E-350 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 132 L |