1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Ford F-350
To start off, 2006 Ford F-350 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 399 kg more than 2006 Ford F-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Sixty | F-350 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1716 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 144 L |
