1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 986 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Sixty | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 60 L |