1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero. (112 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 785 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sixty | Pajero |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1833 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 53 L |
