1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2007 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2007 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Ram (235 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Dodge Ram weights approximately 228 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2007 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | Sixty | Ram |
Year Released | 1965 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 132 L |