1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2007 Mazda 6

To start off, 2007 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2007 Mazda 6. (134 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 575 kg more than 2007 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Cadillac Sixty 2007 Mazda 6
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model Sixty 6
Year Released 1965 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2115 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 5790 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 3390 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 64 L