1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2007 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2007 Nissan Navara is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Navara. (172 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Navara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Nissan Navara weights approximately 9 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 2007 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2007 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Sixty | Navara |
Year Released | 1965 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2124 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 80 L |