1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2008 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2008 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 494 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2008 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | Sixty | Escalade |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 98 L |