1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2008 Opel Astra
To start off, 2008 Opel Astra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 885 kg more than 2008 Opel Astra.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2008 Opel Astra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | Sixty | Astra |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1596 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 52 L |
