1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2008 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2008 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Sequoia (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 785 kg more than 2008 Toyota Sequoia.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Sequoia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2008 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Sixty | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 381 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 100 L |
