1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2009 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo. (105 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2009 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Sixty | Aveo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 35 L |