1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2009 Ford Escape
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Ford Escape. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Escape. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1149 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2009 Ford Escape | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | Escape |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 57 L |