1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 501 kg more than 2009 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Sixty | 5 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 60 L |