1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Aston Martin One-77
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 HP) has 542 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 485 kg more than 2010 Aston Martin One-77.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2010 Aston Martin One-77 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Aston Martin |
| Model | Sixty | One-77 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 750 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1630 kg |
