1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Sixty | Calais |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 344 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |