1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Wrangler. (205 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 318 kg more than 2010 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | Sixty | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1797 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4161 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2423 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |
