1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 194 kg more than 2011 Volvo XC60.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Sixty | XC60 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |