1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford EDGE (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 275 kg more than 2013 Ford EDGE.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | EDGE |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4679 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2223 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 68 L |