1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1 kg more than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Sixty | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2114 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 93 L |