1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2013 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKS (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 79 kg more than 2013 Lincoln MKS.
Because 2013 Lincoln MKS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2013 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | Sixty | MKS |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2036 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5222 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1565 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 72 L |