1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1949 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 720 kg more than 1949 Triumph Mayflower.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 1949 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Caprice | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6999 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2110 mm |
