1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1988 Volvo 240
To start off, 1988 Volvo 240 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1988 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1988 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 380 kg more than 1988 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 1988 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Caprice | 240 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2660 mm |
