1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1992 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1992 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 590 kg more than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 1992 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Caprice | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6999 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2440 mm |
