1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1998 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1998 Ford Taurus is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 1998 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Caprice | Taurus |
Year Released | 1965 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6999 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |