1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1999 Audi TT
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1999 Audi TT. (174 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 360 kg more than 1999 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 1999 Audi TT | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
| Model | Caprice | TT |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 1779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2430 mm |
