1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1999 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 1999 Toyota Avalon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Toyota Avalon weights approximately 11 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Avalon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 1999 Toyota Avalon | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Caprice | Avalon |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6999 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1681 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2610 mm |