1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2000 Hyundai Dynasty
To start off, 2000 Hyundai Dynasty is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Hyundai Dynasty weights approximately 10 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hyundai Dynasty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2000 Hyundai Dynasty | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Hyundai |
| Model | Caprice | Dynasty |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6999 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2870 mm |
