1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2000 Mazda Protege
To start off, 2000 Mazda Protege is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2000 Mazda Protege. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda Protege. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda Protege weights approximately 115 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Protege, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2000 Mazda Protege | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Caprice | Protege |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6476 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2680 mm |