1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (135 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 40 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2000 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
| Model | Caprice | Omega |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2740 mm |
