1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 655 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Caprice | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3510 mm |
