1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 534 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2002 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Caprice | Ka |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1136 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2450 mm |
