1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 180 kg more than 2002 Mazda 6.
Because 2002 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Caprice | 6 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6999 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2680 mm |