1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2002 Opel Omega. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 63 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Caprice | Omega |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6476 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1733 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2710 mm |