1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2002 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2002 Pagani Zonda is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 272 more horse power than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. (275 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 420 kg more than 2002 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2002 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Pagani |
| Model | Caprice | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 547 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2055 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2730 mm |
