1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2003 Mazda Kusabi

To start off, 2003 Mazda Kusabi is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Kusabi. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Kusabi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 585 kg more than 2003 Mazda Kusabi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Kusabi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Chevrolet Caprice 2003 Mazda Kusabi
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Caprice Kusabi
Year Released 1965 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6476 cc 1559 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 275 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1670 kg 1085 kg
Vehicle Length 5420 mm 3810 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2500 mm