1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2004 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 374 kg more than 2004 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2004 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Caprice | Econovan |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6999 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2210 mm |