1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2004 Ford Ka
To start off, 2004 Ford Ka is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 708 kg more than 2004 Ford Ka.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2004 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Caprice | Ka |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6999 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 962 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2450 mm |
