1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (251 HP @ 7150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 254 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Caprice | Clio |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1416 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |
