1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2010 Kia Forte. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Forte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 442 kg more than 2010 Kia Forte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2010 Kia Forte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
| Model | Caprice | Forte |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1228 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4529 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1775 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2649 mm |
