1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 223 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Caprice | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6999 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1893 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2774 mm |
