1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. (275 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Caprice | UTE |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
