1965 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 196 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Caprice | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1866 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3010 mm |
