1965 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 6,491 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Corvette (420 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 30 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Corvette.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Chevrolet Corvette (563 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1965 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Chevrolet Corvette | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Corvette | Condor |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6491 cc | 2437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 70 L |