1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 1959 Ferrari 256 F1
To start off, 1965 Citroen 2CV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 (291 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ferrari 256 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen 2CV | 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ferrari |
| Model | 2CV | 256 F1 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 291 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 8600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2230 mm |
