1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 1966 Simca 1000
To start off, 1966 Simca 1000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 944 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Simca 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Simca 1000 (38 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Simca 1000 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Simca 1000 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 1966 Simca 1000 | |
Make | Citroen | Simca |
Model | 2CV | 1000 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 944 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 47 L |