1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1984 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Ranger |
Year Released | 1965 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4690 mm |