1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2000 Opel Tigra
To start off, 2000 Opel Tigra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Opel Tigra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Tigra (88 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Tigra should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Tigra weights approximately 495 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 2000 Opel Tigra | |
Make | Citroen | Opel |
Model | 2CV | Tigra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |