1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 Smart Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Smart Roadster (100 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2003 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | 2CV | Roadster |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 35 L |