1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1783 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | 2CV | Ram |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 5621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 132 L |